New post

quality score still matters. but most people optimize it wrong.

here is what quality score actually is: a diagnostic tool. it gives you a relative signal on expected click-through rate, ad relevance, and landing page experience. it's not a ranking signal directly. it informs the auction calculation but a 10/10 quality score does not guarantee you win auctions.

the accounts that obsess over quality score: they spend time making headlines match keywords exactly, adding keyword insertion, building tightly themed ad groups. they chase the 10.

the accounts that perform better: they focus on what quality score is pointing at. low expected CTR means your headline isn't compelling. low landing page experience means your page is slow, irrelevant, or doesn't match the intent of the query.

fix the underlying problem, not the score.

the one place quality score is directly useful: competitive benchmarking. if your expected CTR is "below average" while your budget is high, you're paying a premium in every auction because competitors have better creative. that's a real cost. every click costs more than it should.

the check: filter for keywords with quality score 4 or below. look at the component scores. find the weakest component. that's the fix.

for most accounts, the weakest component is landing page experience. not because the page is bad, but because the landing page hasn't been updated to match the current keyword set or audience intent.

/conversion-audit doesn't directly cover quality score, but the search term and RSA components surface the same underlying signals: https://paidmedialab.com/pack

saku